Description

International Laws on War

Description: Explore the framework of international humanitarian law, its key treaties, and contemporary challenges in enforcing these laws in armed conflicts.

The killing of Israeli civilians by Hamas and retaliatory airstrikes on the densely populated Gaza Strip by Israel raises numerous issues under international law.

Hence in this article, we are explaining different international laws. 

Laws of War

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), often referred to as the laws of war, is a critical framework that governs the conduct of armed conflicts and seeks to protect the rights and well-being of those affected by war. These laws encompass various international agreements, including the four 1949 Geneva Conventions, the two Additional Protocols of 1977, the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, and certain weapons conventions. In this article, we will provide a brief overview of these fundamental laws.

The 1949 Geneva Conventions

The 1949 Geneva Conventions consist of four key treaties, each addressing specific aspects of armed conflict:

• The First Geneva Convention (Protection of the Wounded and Sick in the Armed Forces): This convention primarily focuses on safeguarding the rights and welfare of wounded and sick military personnel on the battlefield. It establishes the Red Cross as a symbol of protection and care.
• The Second Geneva Convention (Protection of Wounded, Sick, and Shipwrecked at Sea): This convention extends the principles of the First Convention to naval warfare, ensuring that injured and shipwrecked individuals at sea receive necessary medical care and protection.
• The Third Geneva Convention (Treatment of Prisoners of War): This Convention outlines the rights and treatment of captured enemy combatants or prisoners of war. It prohibits inhumane treatment and establishes guidelines for their protection.
• The Fourth Geneva Convention (Protection of Civilians in Times of Armed Conflict): This crucial convention protects civilians in armed conflicts, emphasizing that they should not be subject to violence or displacement. It also outlines the responsibilities of occupying powers in territories they control.

Additional Protocols of 1977

The Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, adopted in 1977, further refined and expanded IHL:

Protocol I: Addresses international armed conflicts, establishing rules for the protection of civilians and combatants. It sets clear guidelines for distinguishing between military and civilian targets and prohibits attacks on the civilian population.

Protocol II: Pertains to non-international armed conflicts within the borders of a single country, providing protections for civilians not taking part in hostilities.

The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907

The Hague Conventions, held in 1899 and 1907, laid the groundwork for IHL:

The 1899 Hague Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes focused on the peaceful resolution of conflicts through arbitration and set limitations on the use of force.

The 1907 Hague Convention and its annexes established regulations for the conduct of warfare on land and at sea. These included prohibitions on inhumane treatment, the use of certain weapons, and protection for cultural properties.

Certain Weapons Conventions

IHL also encompasses specific treaties that regulate the use of particular weapons, such as the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons and its protocols. These agreements aim to minimize the suffering caused by certain arms and ammunitions, including landmines, booby traps, and incendiary weapons.

Contemporary Challenges

•  Non-State Actors: The evolving nature of warfare, with the proliferation of non-state armed groups, poses challenges in ensuring compliance with IHL. These groups may not be bound by the same legal obligations as nation-states, making enforcement difficult.

•  Cyber Warfare: The advent of cyber warfare has raised questions about how IHL applies to conflicts in the digital realm. Determining the distinction between military and civilian targets in cyberspace is complex.

•  Autonomous Weapons: The development and use of autonomous weapons systems (e.g., drones) raise concerns about accountability and adherence to IHL, especially regarding the principles of proportionality and distinction.

•  Enforcement: Ensuring that states and non-state actors comply with IHL remains a significant challenge. Effective mechanisms for accountability and enforcement are crucial to prevent violations.

Conclusion

International Humanitarian Law is a critical framework for safeguarding humanity during armed conflicts. The four 1949 Geneva Conventions, the two Additional Protocols of 1977, the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, and certain weapons conventions collectively provide a comprehensive set of rules and guidelines. They seek to protect the rights and well-being of wounded and sick combatants, prisoners of war, civilians, and those affected by the devastating impact of war. These laws play a crucial role in upholding human dignity and promoting peace in times of conflict.

Can lawbreakers in Israel and Palestine be held to account?

A United Nations Commission of Inquiry says it is “collecting and preserving evidence of war crimes committed by all sides” in the current conflict. That evidence could be added to an ongoing investigation by the International Criminal Court into the situation in the Palestinian territories.

The Netherlands-based ICC has the power to prosecute nations' officials for violations and order compensation for victims. But some countries – including the United States, Russia, and Israel -- do not recognise the court's jurisdiction, and the ICC does not have a police force to execute arrest warrants.

How to Prepare for IAS |  FAQs on UPSC | Up-to-date Current Affairs | Latest Videos & Updates | Article: SC verdict of Same-sex marriage